Clinical Study Passport gives authorised sponsor teams a private place to define each trial need, identify relevant CROs, compare capabilities consistently, create shortlists, and keep partner engagement connected to the project.
Clinical Study Passport gives authorised sponsor teams a private place to define each trial need, identify relevant CROs, compare capabilities consistently, create shortlists, and keep partner engagement connected to the project.
Teams rely on personal networks, referrals, old spreadsheets, conference contacts, and web searches. This can overlook capable regional CROs and makes the result depend too heavily on who already knows whom.
Country coverage, therapeutic experience, phase expertise, recruitment reach, and capacity arrive in different decks and formats. Teams spend time normalising information before they can make a fair comparison.
A long list may receive the same general request even when many organisations are not suited to the protocol. Sponsor teams review low-fit responses while CROs spend time on briefs they are unlikely to win.
Requirements, notes, shortlists, responses, and reasons for selection can sit across inboxes and separate files, making handovers and later review difficult.
Capture target countries, study phase, therapeutic area, required capabilities, and other project needs once, creating a shared basis for the search.
Review published CRO capabilities against the same criteria, so the team can concentrate on relevant candidates instead of beginning with an unfiltered directory.
Place geographic reach, therapeutic experience, study capability, and supporting organisation information into a clearer structure for evaluation and shortlisting.
Send structured briefs to selected CROs and retain responses, shortlist decisions, and project context together for easier collaboration and review.
A focused search reduces low-value outreach and helps feasibility teams reach a defensible shortlist sooner. Each structured project adds to organisational knowledge, making it easier to revisit suitable partners for future countries, therapeutic areas, and study phases. Better-fit early conversations can reduce avoidable sourcing effort, but final due diligence and contracting remain with the sponsor.
Create a private project with the target countries, phase, therapeutic area, expected services, and capabilities needed from a partner.
Use published capability information to identify organisations whose experience and reach align with the project.
Assess potential partners against consistent criteria, add internal context, and focus the team on the strongest candidates.
Share the project brief with selected CROs and keep replies and partner decisions connected to the original requirement.
The CRO partner directory is not public. Organisation information is available only inside authorised sponsor and administrator accounts, with strict boundaries around volunteer and CRO operational data.
